Cookie settings

We use cookies

Necessary cookies keep the website working and store your choice. With your consent, we can also use functional cookies to remember the theme preference and analytics cookies to measure website usage.

You can accept optional cookies all at once, reject them, or choose individual categories. You can change your consent later; details are available in the Cookies Policy.

LaraDep Documentation

You are reading Managed mode

Managed governance and audit

How to define governance for managed operations: ownership, evidencing, rollback controls, change records, and reliable operation discipline.

Governance for managed operations

The managed mode removes infrastructure maintenance overhead, but team process responsibility still remains. Every deployment needs clear process ownership: who proposes the change, who executes, and who verifies.

Purpose of this page

Define rules that keep your operations stable, auditable, and resilient as team size grows.

Core governance pillars

  • Role model — separate proposer, executor, and reviewer responsibilities.
  • Tag discipline — start with minimal tags for baseline and expand after a successful validation.
  • Run evidence — record purpose, outcome, and follow-up actions every time.
  • Change window — avoid ad-hoc changes outside approved windows.
  • Rollback readiness — define return path before the run starts.

Weekly governance checklist

  1. Change plan — each run has purpose (new environment, rollout, fix, audit).
  2. Pre-run approval — define approver, owner, and impact level.
  3. Execution — keep sequence controlled and avoid parallel ad-hoc changes.
  4. Post-run review — evaluate result and add follow-up tasks.
  5. Evidence retention — run history is the source of truth; chat logs are not sufficient.

Change checkpoints

  • Does each run have approved scope and assigned approver?
  • Were preflight warnings assessed (not ignored)?
  • Is impact level and communication plan defined?
  • Is rollback path prepared before running or only after failure?
  • Did the run record include a short outcome note?

Common governance gaps

  • No explicit approver for unplanned edits,
  • running non-essential tags "just in case",
  • no review and no maintenance window discipline.

Cross-track references

For access control align with workspaces, roles and security, and for complete evidence model use runbook and governance. If operational ownership needs more infrastructure control, compare mode migration.

Next steps

Next step: Use mode migration only after run history and access ownership are stable.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Stay updated with our latest news and articles by subscribing to our newsletter.

Esc Close